Final Fractions Statistics

Postby **fltk** » 23 Feb 2016 23:02

Wow awesome stats.
Mercia OP ? Charlemagne sucks ? All others seem to be balanced ?

Postby **Patronus** » 24 Feb 2016 19:07

Its hard to tell about who is OP or sucks coz not enough was played battles

it will be possible to say exactly at the end of the championship.

Postby **fltk** » 04 Mar 2016 21:07

I feel like Lombards, Avars and Danes are stronger after last patch and Cordoba is weaker because of price increase on their cav. Looking forward to see final stats when we finish tournament.

Postby **deve** » 06 Mar 2016 09:43

fltk wrote:I feel like Lombards, Avars and Danes are stronger after last patch and Cordoba is weaker because of price increase on their cav. Looking forward to see final stats when we finish tournament.

Lombards definitely got stronger because death of gen no longer has such a huge impact on morale like it did before the path (lombards roster has lowest avrg. morale). I personally do not like that change. I think non-elite troops (i.e archers , light axes and spears) should route as soon as gen dies if opponent has numeric superiority.
And changes to Cordoba cav prices do not make any sense.

Postby **Patronus** » 15 Mar 2016 18:28

Update

Postby **deve** » 15 Mar 2016 22:07

wow if avars results is somewhat expected but what happened to lomabards is huge surprise. They were supposed to become better after patch and most predicted them to improve their numbers but happened totally opposite .... confused ....

Postby **Sigurðr** » 10 Apr 2016 09:51

deve wrote:wow if avars results is somewhat expected but what happened to lomabards is huge surprise. They were supposed to become better after patch and most predicted them to improve their numbers but happened totally opposite .... confused ....

Возможно, большинство матчей ломбардами были сыграны до усиливающего их патча?